Characteristic of border of a mass is a helpful clue in the diagnosis of benignity vs malignancy

When physicians palpated an abnormal mass in a patient’s body, one of the characteristics that they determine is whether the border of the mass is well-defined or not.  In trying to weigh the probability or likelihood of the mass being benign (not cancer) or malignant (cancer), the presence of a well-defined border is more in favor of benignity whereas the presence of a poorly-defined border is more in favor of malignancy.

By palpation, a physician decides whether the border of the mass is well-defined or poorly-defined.  The border is said to be well-defined when  a physician can easily outline the margin or border of the mass.  If not, the border is poorly defined.  There may be gradation in the assessment of the border of the mass by the physicians.  It may range from very well-defined to well-defined to not-so-well-defined to poorly-defined, depending on the interpretation of the physicians on their palpation findings.  The different gradational findings on the border of the mass have corresponding gradational implications in terms of suspicion for benignity and malignancy.  Masses with very well-defined and well-defined borders connote benignity with higher probability or likelihood in those with very well-defined borders.   On the other hand, masses with not-so-well-defined or poorly-defined borders connote malignancy with higher probability or likelihood in those with poorly-defined borders compared to not-so-well-defined borders.

Note: There are other terms used by other physicians to describe the characteristic of the border of a palpable mass such as circumscribed border; discrete border; well-circumscribed border; poorly-circumscribed border; etc.

ROJoson’s Way – I usually use the following categorization of findings with their corresponding implications:

  • very well-defined border (definitely well-defined) – highest likelihood for benignity
  • well-defined border – more for benignity
  • not-so-well-defined border – start suspecting malignancy
  • poorly-defined border (definitely poorly defined) – highest likelihood for malignancy

ROJ@18jan26

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Mass and "Bukol". Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s