Ms. Gloria Solmirano is 32 years cancer-free since her modified radical mastectomy in 1983. She is definitely in remission (disappearance of original signs and symptoms of cancer). Question is: is she cured of cancer?
I like to share an article from Dr. Richard Frank before I answer the question: Is she cured of cancer?
Am I Cured Yet? Richard Frank, MD, June 4, 2012, http://blogs.webmd.com/cancer/2012/06/am-i-cured-yet.html
When a person is diagnosed with cancer, the first thing they want to know is whether or not the cancer can be cured. Upon completing treatment, they want to know if the cancer is completely gone and cured now. Finally, after some years have passed since the diagnosis, if the cancer has remained undetectable, most will ask, “Am I cured yet?” In each situation, most patients will not hear the answer they are looking for, which is a definite “yes.” Doctors are so hesitant to use the word cure that I have labeled it the second “C” word in the cancer universe.
The first “C” word is, of course, cancer itself. For over a century since cancer was first described and subsequently came to be feared as a potentially lethal illness, people did not freely and openly utter the word. They avoided it in public and even private conversation. A person had “a growth” or “a mass.” A friend or loved one was “ill” or “very sick” but never with “cancer.” If mentioned, it was only in a whisper. The word itself was referred to as the “C” word and everyone knew what that meant. Betty Ford is credited with bringing cancer into the forum of public discussion, of allowing women to come forth with their struggles against breast cancer and, as a society, we have never looked back. The word “cancer” is now a common topic of conversation, found on stadium marquees for fundraising and is the topic of many blogs such as this one. So it is rather surprising to think that there remains another “C” word that is rarely uttered. But in contrast to “cancer” this word brings great joy and spiritual exaltation. It is the anti-cancer. Despite this, the word is mainly uttered in hushed tones or as a prayer. This “C” word is “cured.”
For a person affected by cancer, the word they want to hear most is “cure” or “cured,” in that they can be or are cured of their cancer. They may have a hard time extracting this from their physicians. Doctors and in particular oncologists are not taught specifically how to use the word cure. If one looks in the index sections of the largest, most respected textbooks on cancer, “cure” is strangely not there. Oncologists are trained to use the term remission: when a cancer is shrunken or removed, either partially or completely, leading to partial remission or complete remission. They also speak of “remission duration”(how long a remission lasts). They talk and write in terms of “survival,” “long-term survival,” and “progression-free survival.” Cancer patients are hard pressed to hear an oncologist say, “Yes, you are cured. You do not need to worry about this cancer again.” Rather, individuals who had cancer and are now cancer free are placed in survivorship clinics or long-term surveillance with their oncologists; they may be told that they are “likely cured” but never fully reassured. The yoke of cancer never seems to be lifted.
So it seems to be the health professionals who have the most difficulty in uttering the second “C” word. Why is this so? For the vast majority of cancers, the physicians will be able to make an accurate prognosis and assess whether the disease is, by and large, curable or non-curable. The non-metastatic stages (typically stages I, II, or III) of the most common cancers, such as breast, prostate, ovary, colon and lung, may be curable. In contrast, the metastatic form of these cancers (stage IV), when the cancer has spread to other parts of the body (such as the liver, lung, bones or brain) is usually not curable. Of course, exceptions abound and every patient is unique; some with stage IV cancer can be cured but this can never be predicted. Still, even for highly curable stage I cancers, there can be relapses and some of these can occur after 5 years (the number most used in cancer statistics to imply cure). An extreme example is kidney cancer, in which relapses have been described as late as 20 years after initial treatment. Furthermore, many blood cancers, such as indolent lymphomas and multiple myeloma, are not yet considered curable even though a patient may be in remission for 5 or 10 years. This knowledge makes oncologists skittish about proclaiming someone cured of their cancer.
So, when can a patient believe with confidence that they are cured and when should their oncologist tell them that they are? I can only speak for myself and say that I love to tell one of my patients that I believe they are cured. Just letting the word out into the open has a magical effect. I feel comfortable saying this with confidence if a patient was treated for an aggressive cancer and it has not returned after five years. I always have to qualify it with “I believe” and “we can’t absolutely predict the future” and, most importantly, the patient will need to continue to see me for the foreseeable future, perhaps only at yearly intervals. But I do utter the cure word. If we can utter the first C word, then we should be able to utter the second one.
I shared the same sentiments as Dr. Frank in that I like to tell my patients as much as possible when they are considered cure when I personally believe they are cured already. There is only one reason or objective for this: to boost their life morale.
Up to this time, as an oncologist, just like majority of oncologists all over the world, the most that I can say on the status of a cancer patient is “in remission.” I am hesitant to use the word “cured.”
I have been doing a collection of my cancer survivors since December 2011 (https://sites.google.com/site/rojosonscancersurvivors/home). For inclusion in my registry of cancer survivors, I used an operational criterion of at least 10 years in remission after treatment. This was based on my experience of less than 1% recurrence, especially in breast cancer patients which comprise the majority of my practice.
After more than four years of registry of cancer survivors, I now have about 107 cancer survivors as of November 14, 2015. The range of years of survivorship or remission is 10 years to 32 years.
After more than four years of registry of cancer survivors, I now start asking – can I talk of cure instead of just remission? can I deduce cure from the length of remission?
I have not seen cancer recurrence in those with 15 years of remission in my cancer patients. Can I deduce cure in those with 15 years of remission?
Cure is defined as there are no traces of cancer after treatment and chances are the cancer will never come back. Using this definition, based on my experience, I think I can deduce cure in those with 15 years of remission, particularly in breast cancer patients.
So, for Gloria Solmirano and other breast cancer patients who are in remission for 15 years or more, I believe you are cured of your cancer.
Just as Dr. Frank said, “If we can utter the first C word (cancer), then we should be able to utter the second one (cure). This will boost the life morale of my patients. This will promote breast wellness.